The American Medical Affiliation (AMA) is now discouraging the usage of physique mass index (BMI), calling it an “imperfect” and “problematic” technique of assessing physique fats and claiming it has been used for “racist exclusion.”
The feedback had been included in a report introduced on the 2023 AMA Annual Assembly in Chicago, Illinois earlier this month.
“BMI cutoffs are based mostly on the imagined ultimate Caucasian and [do] not take into account an individual’s gender or ethnicity,” the report said.
WEIGHT LOSS SURGERIES ON THE RISE AMONG KIDS AND TEENS, STUDY FINDS: ‘ALTERING THE ANATOMY’
The AMA additionally claimed that the historical past of the BMI is rooted in “eugenics,” which is “the scientifically inaccurate concept that people may be improved by way of selective breeding of populations,” per the Nationwide Human Genome Analysis Institute.
What’s BMI?
First created again within the mid-1800s by a Belgian mathematician named Lambert Adolphe Jacques Quetelet, the BMI has been the worldwide normal for measuring weight problems because the Eighties, in accordance with many sources, although some specialists have questioned its validity.
An individual’s BMI is calculated by dividing his or her weight by the sq. of his or her top in ft.
The American Medical Affiliation (AMA) is now discouraging the usage of physique mass index, or BMI, as a way of assessing physique fats. (iStock)
For instance, somebody who’s 5’5″ and 135 kilos would have a BMI of 23.2.
On the BMI scale, any quantity decrease than 18.5 is taken into account underweight, in accordance with the Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention (CDC).
A measurement between 18.5 and fewer than 25 falls inside the wholesome weight vary.
Somebody with a BMI between 25 and 30 is taken into account chubby.
Any measurement 30 or greater signifies weight problems — whereas quite a few over 40 qualifies as extreme weight problems, in accordance with the BMI scale.
Some say BMI linked to ‘White supremacy’ and ‘historical past of hurt’
The Nationwide Alliance for Consuming Issues, based mostly in Florida, has voiced its assist of the AMA’s suggestion to de-emphasize the BMI.
It additionally referred to as for it to be scrapped altogether “because of its racist and sexist requirements and lengthy historical past of hurt, together with hurt towards these most marginalized in our communities.”
DRINKING A GALLON OF WATER PER DAY: DOES IT REALLY HELP WITH WEIGHT LOSS AND FITNESS?
“We advocate for the popularity of weight range and hope that the medical area prioritizes well being measurement instruments that take into consideration the numerous components that contribute to and impression an individual’s well being standing,” mentioned Dr. Katie Mittelstaedt, outreach and medical marketing consultant for group, in an announcement to Fox Information Digital.
One other consuming dysfunction assist group, Venture HEAL in Brooklyn, New York, echoes the claims that the BMI is rooted in racism.

First created within the mid-1800s, the BMI has been the worldwide normal for measuring weight problems because the Eighties. (iStock)
“The BMI relies on analysis from the 1830s meant solely to check populations of white European males and doesn’t have the medical relevance or authority it has been presupposed to have,” mentioned Serena Nangia, spokesperson for Venture HEAL, in an announcement to Fox Information Digital.
WHITE POTATOES VS. SWEET POTATOES: NUTRITION AND HEALTH EXPERTS CHIME IN ON WHICH IS BETTER
“BMI has for many years been held inaccurately because the gold normal for the measurement of well being, however its origins, in addition to its makes use of, are rooted in white supremacy.”
‘It’s not racist — it’s referred to as good drugs,’ physician says
Dr. Marc Siegel, professor of medication at NYU Langone Medical Middle and a Fox Information medical contributor, spoke out in opposition to the AMA’s stance on “The Ingraham Angle” earlier this week.
“I didn’t imagine the AMA was going to get entangled in cancel tradition, however now they’re canceling the physique mass index, which is the factor I take a look at to at the very least begin me off within the course of weight problems,” he mentioned.

The AMA’s name to abolish BMI may inhibit the power to get insurance coverage firms to pay for treating weight problems, warned one physician. (iStock)
The physician mentioned he makes use of the BMI as a primary guideline to find out whether or not a affected person is in a class that requires nearer monitoring.
“It’s not racist — it’s referred to as good drugs,” he mentioned.
Dr. Siegel mentioned he believes the AMA’s new coverage was fueled by the physique positivity motion — however he cautioned that eradicating the BMI measurement is a step within the “incorrect course” and will “result in unhealthy well being outcomes.”
He mentioned, “We don’t have sufficient prevention as it’s, and we’re transferring away from prevention.”
Eradicating the BMI measurement is a step within the “incorrect course.”
The physician warned that the AMA’s name to abolish the BMI may inhibit the power to get insurance coverage firms to pay for treating weight problems.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
Whereas Siegel does agree with the AMA’s assertion that visceral fats — which is fats that’s discovered within the stomach — is probably the most worrisome sort, he mentioned he nonetheless depends on the BMI as an total indication of whether or not somebody is at a better danger of diabetes, coronary heart illness, most cancers and hypertension.
CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR HEALTH NEWSLETTER
“I don’t want somebody taking a device out of my toolbox, and that’s what they’re doing right here,” he mentioned.
“That is politics, not drugs.”
Discussion about this post